Whetton Chris, Twist Liz & Sainsbury Marian (2007). Â« Measuring standards in primary English : The validity of PIRLS - a response to Mary Hilton Â». British Educational Research Journal, vol. 33, nÂ° 6, octobre, p. 977–986. En ligne : <http://ejournals.ebsco. ... contributionid=13149123>.
Added by: Marie Gaussel (21 Jun 2010 11:18:48 Europe/Paris)
|Resource type: Journal Article
BibTeX citation key: Whetton2007
Keywords: enseignement primaire, PIRLS, test normalisĂ©
Creators: Sainsbury, Twist, Whetton
Collection: British Educational Research Journal
Views index: 20%
Popularity index: 5%
|URLs http://ejournals.e ... ibutionid=13149123|
Hilton (2006) criticises the PIRLS (Progress in International Reading Literacy Study) tests and the survey conduct, raising questions about the validity of international surveys of reading. Her criticisms fall into four broad areas: cultural validity, methodological issues, construct validity and the survey in England. However, her criticisms are shown to be mistaken. Her claim of forced unidimensionality in the tests is not supported by statistical analyses and her claims of cultural strangeness are contradicted by the involvement of all the countries involved. She is concerned about linguistic diversity but this is actually reflected in the ways countries organise their surveys. Finally, Hilton suggests that the English sample was biased, but fails to recognise the stringent sampling requirements or the monitoring roles of external assessors and the sampling referee. A careful study of the evidence concerning PIRLS shows that it is actually a fair and robust measure of reading attainment in different countries.
Added by: Marie Gaussel