Lawrence Peter A. (2008). Â« Lost in publication : How measurement harms science Â». Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, vol. 8, nÂ° 1. En ligne : <http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esep/v8/n1/p9-11/>.
Added by: orey (19 Jan 2009 09:34:58 Europe/Paris) Last edited by: orey (19 Jan 2009 09:49:08 Europe/Paris)
|Resource type: Journal Article
BibTeX citation key: Lawrence2008a
Collection: Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics
Views index: 23%
Popularity index: 5.75%
|URLs http://www.int-res ... /esep/v8/n1/p9-11/|
Measurement of scientific productivity is difficult. The measures used (impact factor of the journal, citations to the paper being measured) are crude. But these measures are now so universally adopted that they determine most things that matter: tenure or unemployment, a postdoctoral grant or none, success or failure. As a result, scientists have been forced to downgrade their primary aim from making discoveries to publishing as many papers as possibleâ€”and trying to work them into high impact factor journals. Consequently, scientific behaviour has become distorted and the utility, quality and objectivity of articles has deteriorated. Changes to the way scientists are assessed are urgently needed, and I suggest some here.
Added by: orey Last edited by: orey