WIKINDX Resources
|
Pennock Robert T. (2003). « Creationism and Intelligent Design ». Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, n° 4, p. 143–163. En ligne : <http://arjournals.annua ... v.genom.4.070802.110400>.
Added by: Marie Musset (29 May 2008 14:29:15 Europe/Paris) Last edited by: Agnès Cavet (27 Oct 2008 11:06:56 Europe/Paris) |
| Resource type: Journal Article DOI: 10.1146/annurev.genom.4.070802.110400 BibTeX citation key: Pennock2003  |
Categories: General Keywords: enseignement de l'évolution, États-Unis, sciences, sciences et société Creators: Pennock Collection: Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics |
Views: 1646/3304
Views index: 20% Popularity index: 5% |
| URLs http://arjournals. ... om.4.070802.110400 |
| Abstract |
|
"Creationism, the rejection of evolution in favor of supernatural design, comes in many varieties besides the common young-earth Genesis version. Creationist attacks on science education have been evolving in the last few years through the alliance of different varieties. Instead of calls to teach “creation science,‷0i0k0i0n0d0x one now finds lobbying for “intelligent design‷0i0k0i0n0d0x (ID). Guided by the Discovery Institute's “Wedge strategy,‷0i0k0i0n0d0x the ID movement aims to overturn evolution and what it sees as a pernicious materialist worldview and to renew a theistic foundation to Western culture, in which human beings are recognized as being created in the image of God. Common ID arguments involving scientific naturalism, “irreducible complexity,‷0i0k0i0n0d0x “complex specified information,‷0i0k0i0n0d0x and “icons of evolution,‷0i0k0i0n0d0x have been thoroughly examined and refuted. Nevertheless, from Kansas to Ohio to the U.S. Congress, ID continues lobbying to teach the controversy, and scientists need to be ready to defend good evolution education."
Added by: Agnès Cavet Last edited by: Agnès Cavet |